【独立新闻在线】起诉大道公司胜算蛮高 雪州能以法律途径拆墩
※ 陈慧思
尽管雪兰莪州蕉赖皇冠镇路墩路段证实为州政府土地，但放墩、拆墩、50发催泪弹暴力驱散居民过后，雪州政府迄今尚未向公众梳理出解决问题的脉络。从宣称开路有望，到发现阻碍重重，坊间开始质疑州政府的魄力。横在州政府眼前的，还有哪些选项？
执业律师兼民主行动党沙登区国会议员张念群认为，雪州政府可以起诉大道公司；她对《独立新闻在线》说，只要州政府十分肯定路墩所在地属于州政府地段，大道公司Grand Saga就无权设路墩封路。
张念群认为，此事可透过法律途径解决，而且州政府胜算相当高，她也一直鼓励州政府起诉大道公司Grand Saga。不过，起诉与否，还得由雪兰莪州务大臣卡立依布拉欣（Khalid Ibrahim）定夺。
尽管张念群屡番建议州政府起诉大道公司，但州政府始终没有说明它没有诉诸法律诉讼的原因。还没有机会阅读大道特许经营合约的张念群认为，卡立可能担心大道特许经营合约的内容令州政府败诉，因而按兵不动。
州政府胜算蛮高
问及州政府是否有很强的论点起诉大道公司，张念群说：“只要州政府很确定那块地是他们的，Grand Saga就不能在那里封路；就算是我们的住家，我们建任何东西如果没有得到市议会批准，市议会也有权来拆呀。”
她说：“在这样的情况下，我觉得州政府的胜算其实是蛮高的。”
无论如何，她指出，土地局和图测局的报告证实路墩的所在地属于州政府土地，可是该路段之外就已属联邦政府土地，因此，就算州政府能阻止大道公司在原来的路段设路障，也无法阻止大道公司在附近路段重施故技。
可是，张念群指出，如果大道公司把路墩移前一些，就会阻止更多人使用替代路段，引起更大反弹，因此挪移路墩的可能性不大。
目前路墩只是阻碍了皇冠镇的居民出入，没有妨碍到附近其他花园区的居民出入。
迄今蕉赖皇冠镇路墩事件已有三项法庭诉讼，首先发展商Narajaya公司在去年10月4日入禀吉隆坡民事高庭，起诉Grand Saga和马来西亚大道局。接着，皇冠镇开路行动委员会主席陈文华在5月9日向吉隆坡民事高庭申请庭令，阻止大道公司Grand Saga在皇冠镇路段放置路墩封路。
5月12日，高庭以“路墩设在特许经营范围（concession area）”为由，驳回陈文华的申请。Grand Saga当天也向高庭申请庭令，阻止开路委员会开路，并起诉雪兰莪州行政议员刘天球、陈文华及加影市议会，指他们无权进入和破坏任何该公司在1995年9 月19日与大道局签署的协议中划出的范围。
居民诉讼有障碍
代表陈文华申请庭令的张念群指出，申请庭令时律师是以“行动理原因”（cause of action）的基础为居民辩驳，可是此一辩驳基础存在一个问题，因为阻止人民使用道路是属于“公共侵扰”（public nuisance）的范畴，如果要针对公众案子展开诉讼，需事先得到总检察署的同意。
至于总检察署会否同意，她并不感乐观。她说：“如果总检察署愿意通过，那么大道局也会阻止Grand Saga封路了，那就没有问题了。”
由于由居民本身提出诉讼存在障碍，张念群认为，由州政府提出诉讼是最恰当的。她说：“你不一定要重新起诉，你可以干预（intervene）任何一个诉讼。”
无论如何，由于卡立许诺在下周作出新的宣布，而5月21日房屋发展商Narajaya起诉Grand Saga的官司将开审，因此她认为，诉讼一事还需观望上述两个事件的进展，现阶段最好还是按兵不动。
另一名参与路墩事件和诉讼的雪州泗岩沬区（Segambut）国会议员林立迎接受《独立新闻在线》的电询时则表示，州政府确实可以入禀法庭申请庭令，可是目前路墩事件已有三个法律诉讼，多一个官司乃多此一举，没有必要再由州政府提出诉讼。
他说：“我对卡立很有信心，他说给每一方一星期，那么相信一星期之后就会有有利于人民的宣布。”
他也透露，三案的代表律师将在下周研究如何进行和配搭审讯，如果三方律师同意由同一法庭同一法官审理此案，那么三个案子很可能“三合一”。
欧阳否认读者指摘
雪兰莪州政府处理皇冠镇路墩事件的手法，已令坊间出现微言。尽管州政府掌权之后即刻宣布开路有望，令失望已极的居民重燃希望。可是，开路的事态发展，曝露了重重障碍，居民距离挥别路墩的日子，恐怕尚有一些时日。
蕉赖皇冠镇开路行动委员会主席陈文华在5月9日向雪州州务大臣卡立提呈备忘录时，向记者明白表示不满雪州政府处理“石墩”事件的速度与力度。《独立新闻在线》近来也收到一些读者来函，质疑雪兰莪州政府的执行力。
其中，有读者质疑为何雪州政府没有发出公文，清楚表达它在此议题上的立场，也有读者质问州政府，为何在冲突事件发生时，没有派出市议会执法人员到场，且不顾人民的安全，率领居民拆除路墩。
雪兰莪州行政议员欧阳捍华接受《独立新闻在线》电询时，否认民联议员率领居民拆除路墩，拆除路墩是居民自发的举动。他表示，州政府没有妄顾人民利益，反之处处以照顾人民，把人民的利益列为最主要的考量。
他表示，目前路墩事件还没有新进展，而州务大臣或在下周一或二与各造展开会谈，周三则将作出新的宣布。由于州务大臣已下令莫向媒体发放消息，因此他暂时无法透露更多详情。
欧阳捍华指出，州政府现下还没有考虑展开法律诉讼一事，此事还需交由州务大臣决定。至于大道公司强硬放置路墩时，为何加影市议会没有派出执法人员到场，他说此乃刘天球的权限，还需直接询问刘天球。
《独立新闻在线》尝试联络刘天球，可是他一直没有接听电话。
欧阳捍华也补充，皇冠镇今日的局面，发展商需要负很大的责任，当初发展商曾在售屋广告上说明居民“不必付过路费”，可是发生事情之后，发展商即为己方利益，撇开责任，没有站出来捍卫人民的利益。
皇冠镇位于雪兰莪州蕉赖11英里，蕉赖－加影大道有两个收费站（11英里及9英里），从皇冠镇这个路口衔接蕉赖－加影大道的九英里路段前往蕉赖市区，只需在蕉赖九英里收费站缴付一次过路费。不过，大道公司Grand Saga后来却在上述路口设置路墩堵路，令居民必须绕道近七公里的路途，沿着双溪龙（Sungai Long）公路从蕉赖12英里进入蕉赖－加影大道，并在11英里收费站多缴付一次过路费，来回合计马币3元80分。
此文转载自《独立新闻在线》
Previous in This Category: 【当今大马】 卡在车流疏漏及赔偿问题 皇冠城开路会议没有结果 Next in This Category: 【讲座】 皇冠城封路事件讲座
Malaysian Bar Council 
1樓
1樓搶頭香
I'm a bit confuse about the State government ability to act.
1st, the state government got an independent and from Town
Council land surveyor to verify that the land is from Selangor.
2nd since you've got evidence that this land is belong to state
government and you can take legal action against Grand Saga.
So why the Mentri Besar still hasn't taken any legal action? Is
he sleeping?
On the other note, I'm also curious why the Menteri Besar hasn't
taken any action against those previous Selangor government
officers that destroy secret documents? Since there were
pictures showing them did that from the media
2樓
2樓頸推
Grand Saga seems to be fighting a proxy war. The Court and
police seems to be backing this company.
Come on, it is barely 2 months since PR took over and the people
they are coming up against is not fighting fair. I mean full
force of FRU against people voicing their rights.
I think the MB has progress from opposition to person in charge
of government machinery quiet well. Rebels usually are not good
administrators. They are against an entrenched network.
Be patient. If there is a GOD, there is a fair outcome.
3樓
3樓坐沙發
It is true what Lim Lip Eng is saying. There are already some
court cases against Grand Saga and see how it goes. The verdict
thereon can be used to determine next course of legal action.
PR is fighting this the civilised way. I hope there is a fair
trial. The PM wants to re-from judiciary. This will be test case
to his effectiveness. Notice he has not uttered a single word
about this? His deputy spent more time talking about Mongolia
than Cheras Mahkota. Please can this government tackle our daily
problems? Get down to work for the peoplw, please.
4樓
福樓
I think it would be unlogic to give blind support to PR without
checking their progress. So far has the Menteri Besar done
anything? I've only seen DAP ADUN & MP there to fight, and when
the police came, it just seems like DAP is helpless even they
tried. PAS and PKR Malay ADUN & MP never show up to fight for
this cause. Where were they when the people of Mahkota Cheras
was spray with water canon? Was it because this area was
resided by mostly Chinese that this is not their business to
help the people there?
5樓
專業的5樓
Not only I'm the one who lost patient with the Menteri Besar.
Even Tony Pua from DAP has expressed his concern over the
Menteri Besar "sleeping attitude". Tony Pua said " It is
critical that the new state government demonstrate political
will and determination to stand for what is right and just,
without fear or favour, instead of wavering in uncertainty or
adopting a “we will look into it” or “we will have to discuss
further” culture which is reminiscent of the previous Barisan
Nasional government. It is of great concern that Tan Sri Khalid
Ibrahim had qualified his statement on the “right of use” by
saying that the state government must also take into
consideration that the toll is the source of revenue for the
company."
http://dapmalaysia.org/english/2008/may08/bul/bul3469.htm
6樓
6樓
The Menteri Besar and even Ms Teo has mentioned that the state
gov has the right to take legal action. Since there's evidence
from the Land Surveyor, why until now there's no legal action?
Do we want to see the residence in Mahkota Cheras, like Tony Pua
said, have to face with FRU for 2nd time before Menteri Besar
decided to take action?
If we keep on having that attitude of PR just being government
and give them chance then we are just blindly support them just
like the way how the old days when most Malays blindly supported
UMNO. This is just the 1st task for the PR government to
handle. There are lots more tasks coming. If they cannot
settle this issue soon, then the next 4-5 years they'll just be
focusing on this issue and nothing else for the development for
Selangor
7樓
7樓
I share some of Tan's feelings. Giving the Menteri
Besar the benefits of doubts, I do have
reservations about his statement - 'Resolve
barricade row or we'll step in'
What did he mean by resolving the barricade row?
As long as it is resolved, then he is happy? Even
if it favours Grand Saga by erecting the baricade?
8樓
8樓
i didn't subscribe to malaysiakini to read the full
article....so I don't know if the MB has explicitly
spoken up for the residents in that
article....otherwise my reservation remains