頭香對麥可已不再具吸引力
Tax Reduction and Salary Reduction
Everybody looks forward tax reduction, but not salary reduction; however, both of them should be took into consideration while government meets severe overspending. Theoretically, the scale of governmental expenditure depends on the demand of revenue. Aftr KMT goernment taking office, the debts have already increased more than 700 billion NT dollars in six months. This number is almost the income of taxation and hits a historical record. Therefore,thorough salary reduction, from president, vise president, ministers, directors and below, should be took into consideration of policy.
During campaign when Ma administration launching the notions of patriotic twelve constructions, they should actively prepare long-term financial source. In fact, tax reduction was utilized as the emergent solution in recent administering; additionally, Ma administration accepted Cruman’s opinions and sloganeered in fashion of raising loans to boom economy. Finally, tax reduction and expansionary fianacial policy were on the table. In policies, flattering the rich and poor at the same time is rarely-heard. Furthermore, there is no country decreases the tax of the wealthy throughout the world; in theU.S. and U.K., it is possible to increase their tax. However, Taiwan sets the center of asset management for the wealthy and is researching how to lessen the tax for the wealth by means of tax reduction and exemption.
The policymakers of Ma administration require all citizens to endure the hardship of losing jobs and receiving diminishing salaries, but they still obtain high pays. In the eyes of the 500,000 unemployed people and their families, it is not only doleful but also irony.
In Singapore, the officials of government felt guilty and were willing to receive reducted salaries because of the stagnant economy. Some KMT legislators with conscience have already publicly called for the follow-ups of Ma administration. Thus, policymakers should response their requests as soon as possible, partly because the follow-ups can mollify the stress of deteriorating finance, and partly because government can apoligize to the public for inappropriate tax reduction for the wealth and the consequence of leaving offsprings the debts.
Previous in This Category: 雪梨之長篇大論消費券 Next in This Category: Tax cut, salary cut and I need a hair cut

1樓
1樓搶頭香
Mia to 李鴻
Paul Krugman
2008諾貝爾經濟學獎得主
2樓
2樓頸推
Mia to 麥克(也就是李鴻)
第三段最後一句
詞性沒有對等
it is not only doleful but also irony.
ironic才對
3樓
3樓坐沙發
你竟然知道我叫李鴻 我嚇到了
謝謝你的意見